Other drug classes for similar indications and in which similar endpoints could be evaluated. This resulted in three subcategories and the exclusion of studies on treatment intensification, due to the absence of comparable endpoints. The results of the meta-analysis are visualized in Forest plots. Low heterogeneity in the outcome was seen in the treatment-naive subgroup and the patients switching successful suppressive therapy group. Higher heterogeneity was seen in the studies for patients experiencing virological failure, which points to a higher inter-study variation on virological outcome. When assessing the immunological response after start of INIs, the majority of the controlled studies with raltegravir, elvitegravir or dolutegravir indicate a similar median CD4 increase compared to other regimens. However, in therapy-naive patients, GS-236- 0102, SINGLE and the long-term follow-up of STARTMRK, all reported significantly higher CD4 increments compared to efavirenz-based therapies. In the subgroup of treatment-experienced patients with virological failure, use of raltegravir resulted in significant better immunological outcome in BENCHMRK 1 and 2 compared to placebo. ODIS reported similar significant results after switching to raltegravir from a boosted PI. The INIs are generally well tolerated and rarely Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emerging adverse events are reported. Compared to efavirenz, discontinuation from INIs due to clinical adverse events is infrequent, while compared to PIs, less severe and lifethreatening laboratory abnormalities are observed. An 2353-45-9 overview of the major adverse events of all INIs can be found in Table 1. In case of treatment failure in therapy-naive patients, few but high-level raltegravir and elvitegravir resistance was CNX-419 distributor observed, which often conferred cross-resistance to these drugs. No resistance for dolutegravir in this patient population was detected. When combined with dual NRTI, the occurrence of raltegravir or elvitegravir resistance-associated mutations was associated in 50 of cases with resistance to NRTI. We performed a systematic review on all published clinical data concerning integrase inhibitors and subsequently meta-analyses on the virological outcome of those studies which included a controlled arm. Based on the me
