Resence in TcV and TcVI parasites (newest hybrid groups [51,52]). Further, considering the “Two Hybridization” model, the absence of iTS in TcIII and TcIV could be explained by an inequitable ancient recombination, gene conversion or by loss of iTS corresponding genes. In the “Three Ancestor” model [52] TcIII-TcIV could have early diverged from TcI 25033180 and propagated without iTS genes. The close relationship between TcIII and IV with TcI is also supported by findings with cruzipain and TSSA antigens [45,53]. As 
shown in HDAC-IN-3 Figure 3, an alternative picture of T. cruzi evolution might be drawn that fits the previously obtained data plus that reported here. Ancestor parasites lack iTS, then TcII acquired iTS and both TcI and TcII became ancestors of all the other DTUs. A single hybridization event is postulated between TcII and TcIII that rendered TcV and VI, TcIII and IV seem to have evolved from TcI instead from hybridization of TcI with TcII because this hypothesis requires two events, the hybridization itself followed by the lost of the iTS genes contributed by TcII genome. Finding an association between clinical manifestations and parasite genotype is a difficult task. The multiclonal nature of most natural infections and the histotropic behavior of different parasites lead to partial characterizations when bloodstream and/or other infected tissue samples are analyzed [54,55]. The regional diversity of Avasimibe price Chagas disease outcomes has been attributed to a set of complex interactions where the parasite genetic makeup, as well as the environmental and the host immunogenetic background are some of the factors involved (reviewed by [56]). In the challenge to identify links between the infecting DTUs and the pathogenesis induced by T. cruzi we presented for the first time the differential distribution among parasite populations of iTS/ aTS, a virulence factor-related gene that is well correlated with the evolutionary history of the parasite. The expression of this complex (aTSa/iTS) of virulent genes may be a key to better understand the mechanism of virulence and its relationship with T. cruzi evolution.Supporting InformationFigure S1 Consensus sequence of TS gene internal region. Sequence alignment of T. cruzi stocks encompassing the 6 DTUs (TcI to TcVI). (.): conserved sites; (.): SNPs that identify a group of parasites (inter-DTU polymorphism). In those positions, depicted nucleotide for each DTU was present in all sequences obtained from all parasites of each DTU (named as IUPAC code); (*): other polymorphic positions not shared by all stocks within a DTU (intra-DTU polymorphisms); TGG: Trp312 codon conserved in all stocks from all DTUs; Box: Tyr342His codon where Thymidine (encoding Tyr) and Cytosine (encoding His) are present in all stocks belonging to TcII, TcV and TcVI whereas only Thymidine was found in TcI, TcIII and TcIV genomes. No other mutations were found in this codon. (TIF)Figure 3. Parasite DTU evolution model 
16574785 proposed. Considering the previously proposed evolution models [3] together with data reported here, an evolution model is drawn where the acquisition of the iTS gene by a single mutation event by TcII places TcI and TcII as the only ancestors for all the other DTUs. A single hybridization event of TcIII and TcII derivates in TcV and VI as previously proposed. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058967.gFigure S2 UPGMA tree based on TS genes sequence alignment (with ambiguous states) not including hybrid DTUs. To avoid deviations in.Resence in TcV and TcVI parasites (newest hybrid groups [51,52]). Further, considering the “Two Hybridization” model, the absence of iTS in TcIII and TcIV could be explained by an inequitable ancient recombination, gene conversion or by loss of iTS corresponding genes. In the “Three Ancestor” model [52] TcIII-TcIV could have early diverged from TcI 25033180 and propagated without iTS genes. The close relationship between TcIII and IV with TcI is also supported by findings with cruzipain and TSSA antigens [45,53]. As shown in Figure 3, an alternative picture of T. cruzi evolution might be drawn that fits the previously obtained data plus that reported here. Ancestor parasites lack iTS, then TcII acquired iTS and both TcI and TcII became ancestors of all the other DTUs. A single hybridization event is postulated between TcII and TcIII that rendered TcV and VI, TcIII and IV seem to have evolved from TcI instead from hybridization of TcI with TcII because this hypothesis requires two events, the hybridization itself followed by the lost of the iTS genes contributed by TcII genome. Finding an association between clinical manifestations and parasite genotype is a difficult task. The multiclonal nature of most natural infections and the histotropic behavior of different parasites lead to partial characterizations when bloodstream and/or other infected tissue samples are analyzed [54,55]. The regional diversity of Chagas disease outcomes has been attributed to a set of complex interactions where the parasite genetic makeup, as well as the environmental and the host immunogenetic background are some of the factors involved (reviewed by [56]). In the challenge to identify links between the infecting DTUs and the pathogenesis induced by T. cruzi we presented for the first time the differential distribution among parasite populations of iTS/ aTS, a virulence factor-related gene that is well correlated with the evolutionary history of the parasite. The expression of this complex (aTSa/iTS) of virulent genes may be a key to better understand the mechanism of virulence and its relationship with T. cruzi evolution.Supporting InformationFigure S1 Consensus sequence of TS gene internal region. Sequence alignment of T. cruzi stocks encompassing the 6 DTUs (TcI to TcVI). (.): conserved sites; (.): SNPs that identify a group of parasites (inter-DTU polymorphism). In those positions, depicted nucleotide for each DTU was present in all sequences obtained from all parasites of each DTU (named as IUPAC code); (*): other polymorphic positions not shared by all stocks within a DTU (intra-DTU polymorphisms); TGG: Trp312 codon conserved in all stocks from all DTUs; Box: Tyr342His codon where Thymidine (encoding Tyr) and Cytosine (encoding His) are present in all stocks belonging to TcII, TcV and TcVI whereas only Thymidine was found in TcI, TcIII and TcIV genomes. No other mutations were found in this codon. (TIF)Figure 3. Parasite DTU evolution model 16574785 proposed. Considering the previously proposed evolution models [3] together with data reported here, an evolution model is drawn where the acquisition of the iTS gene by a single mutation event by TcII places TcI and TcII as the only ancestors for all the other DTUs. A single hybridization event of TcIII and TcII derivates in TcV and VI as previously proposed. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058967.gFigure S2 UPGMA tree based on TS genes sequence alignment (with ambiguous states) not including hybrid DTUs. To avoid deviations in.
