S after 12 hours of E. coli Nissle 1917 stimulation (0.71-fold, 15900046 p = 0.047). Hath1 mRNA levels (Fig. 1B and Fig. S1B) were also significantly downregulated by treatment with E. coli K-12 (3 hours: 0.69-fold, p = 0.002; 12 hours: 0.85-fold, p = 0.008) and E. coli Nissle 1917 (3 hours: 0.74-fold, p = 0.025; 12 hours: 0.80-fold, p = 0.001). This E. coli Nissle 1917 effect on Hath1 mRNA expression was purchase Dimethylenastron confirmed by Western blot analysis showing Hath1 protein levels to be significantly decreased after 6 hours of bacterial exposure (0.71-fold, p = 0.038, Fig. 2B).StatisticsQuantitative real-time PCR and Western blot results were analysed using the Mann-Whitney test. Values of p,0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed and all graphs were generated with the GraphPadBacteria Regulate Intestinal DifferentiationFigure 5. Hes1, Hath1, HBD2 and Muc1 mRNA expression in LS174T cells 117793 web incubated with heat inactivated E. coli Nissle 1917 wild type and mutant strains (see Tab. 1) for 3 hours. Treatment with EcN wt, EcNDcsgBA (curli-negative), EcNDfim (Type 18325633 1 pili) and EcNDfoc (F1C pili) led to a significant downregulation of Hes1 (A) and Hath1 (B) transcripts, whereas HBD2 (C) and Muc1 (D) mRNA was upregulated. In contrast, EcNDfliA (sigma factor of flagellin), EcNDfliC (flagellin), EcNDflgE (hook) lost the regulation ability. Data represent the means 6 SEM normalised to basal expression of untreated controls set at 1 (n = 3). *: p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055620.gKLF4 mRNA transcripts (Fig. 1C and Fig. S1C) were significantly induced after a 3 hour treatment with L. fermentum (1.2-fold, p = 0.011, Fig. 1C) and significantly reduced after 12 hours of treatment with E. coli K-12 (0.81-fold, p = 0.005), E. coli Nissle 1917 (0.83-fold, p = 0.008), L. acidophilus (0.77-fold, p = 0.008) and B. vulgatus (0.77-fold, p = 0.003). KLF4 protein levels were also slightly downregulated after 24 hours incubation with E. coli Nissle 1917 (0.69-fold, p = 0.06, Fig. 2C).HBD2 and Muc1 but not Muc2 are Regulated by Bacteria in vitroSince downregulation of both Hes1 and Hath1 expression levels could lead to differentiation to either the absorptive or the secretory cell lineage, we further investigated the effect of bacteria on epithelial differentiation by analysing the expression of HBD2, Muc1 and Muc2 in LS174T cells after treatment with different bacteria strains.Bacteria Regulate Intestinal Differentiationexpression after exposure to E. coli Nissle 1917 was confirmed on the protein level by immunocytochemistry (Fig. 4A). Muc2 mRNA (Fig. 3C and Fig. S2C) expression was unchanged after exposure to intestinal bacteria. Accordingly, incubation with E. coli Nissle 1917 had no effect on Muc2 protein content (Fig. 4B). To clarify whether the effects on HBD2 and Muc1 expression are caused by bacterial treatment or indirectly by changes in Hes1 and Hath1 expression, we blocked the Notch pathway in LS174T cells using the gamma-secretase inhibitor DBZ up to 24 hours with and without E. coli Nissle. The DBZ treatment led to a strong downregulation of Hes1 (3 h: 0.34-fold, p = 0.01; 6 h: 0.11-fold, p = 0.0003; 12 h: 0.09-fold, p,0.0001 and 24 h: 0.11-fold, p = 0.001) followed by a delayed Hath1 upregulation (3 h: 0.93fold, n.s.; 6 h: 1.19-fold, p = 0.0206; 12 h: 2.01-fold, p = 0,0297 and 24 h: 2.44-fold, p = 0.0032), without affecting HBD2, Muc1 or Muc2 expression. Thus, no significant differences in mRNA expression of these p.S after 12 hours of E. coli Nissle 1917 stimulation (0.71-fold, 15900046 p = 0.047). Hath1 mRNA levels (Fig. 1B and Fig. S1B) were also significantly downregulated by treatment with E. coli K-12 (3 hours: 0.69-fold, p = 0.002; 12 hours: 0.85-fold, p = 0.008) and E. coli Nissle 1917 (3 hours: 0.74-fold, p = 0.025; 12 hours: 0.80-fold, p = 0.001). This E. coli Nissle 1917 effect on Hath1 mRNA expression was confirmed by Western blot analysis showing Hath1 protein levels to be significantly decreased after 6 hours of bacterial exposure (0.71-fold, p = 0.038, Fig. 2B).StatisticsQuantitative real-time PCR and Western blot results were analysed using the Mann-Whitney test. Values of p,0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed and all graphs were generated with the GraphPadBacteria Regulate Intestinal DifferentiationFigure 5. Hes1, Hath1, HBD2 and Muc1 mRNA expression in LS174T cells incubated with heat inactivated E. coli Nissle 1917 wild type and mutant strains (see Tab. 1) for 3 hours. Treatment with EcN wt, EcNDcsgBA (curli-negative), EcNDfim (Type 18325633 1 pili) and EcNDfoc (F1C pili) led to a significant downregulation of Hes1 (A) and Hath1 (B) transcripts, whereas HBD2 (C) and Muc1 (D) mRNA was upregulated. In contrast, EcNDfliA (sigma factor of flagellin), EcNDfliC (flagellin), EcNDflgE (hook) lost the regulation ability. Data represent the means 6 SEM normalised to basal expression of untreated controls set at 1 (n = 3). *: p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055620.gKLF4 mRNA transcripts (Fig. 1C and Fig. S1C) were significantly induced after a 3 hour treatment with L. fermentum (1.2-fold, p = 0.011, Fig. 1C) and significantly reduced after 12 hours of treatment with E. coli K-12 (0.81-fold, p = 0.005), E. coli Nissle 1917 (0.83-fold, p = 0.008), L. acidophilus (0.77-fold, p = 0.008) and B. vulgatus (0.77-fold, p = 0.003). KLF4 protein levels were also slightly downregulated after 24 hours incubation with E. coli Nissle 1917 (0.69-fold, p = 0.06, Fig. 2C).HBD2 and Muc1 but not Muc2 are Regulated by Bacteria in vitroSince downregulation of both Hes1 and Hath1 expression levels could lead to differentiation to either the absorptive or the secretory cell lineage, we further investigated the effect of bacteria on epithelial differentiation by analysing the expression of HBD2, Muc1 and Muc2 in LS174T cells after treatment with different bacteria strains.Bacteria Regulate Intestinal Differentiationexpression after exposure to E. coli Nissle 1917 was confirmed on the protein level by immunocytochemistry (Fig. 4A). Muc2 mRNA (Fig. 3C and Fig. S2C) expression was unchanged after exposure to intestinal bacteria. Accordingly, incubation with E. coli Nissle 1917 had no effect on Muc2 protein content (Fig. 4B). To clarify whether the effects on HBD2 and Muc1 expression are caused by bacterial treatment or indirectly by changes in Hes1 and Hath1 expression, we blocked the Notch pathway in LS174T cells using the gamma-secretase inhibitor DBZ up to 24 hours with and without E. coli Nissle. The DBZ treatment led to a strong downregulation of Hes1 (3 h: 0.34-fold, p = 0.01; 6 h: 0.11-fold, p = 0.0003; 12 h: 0.09-fold, p,0.0001 and 24 h: 0.11-fold, p = 0.001) followed by a delayed Hath1 upregulation (3 h: 0.93fold, n.s.; 6 h: 1.19-fold, p = 0.0206; 12 h: 2.01-fold, p = 0,0297 and 24 h: 2.44-fold, p = 0.0032), without affecting HBD2, Muc1 or Muc2 expression. Thus, no significant differences in mRNA expression of these p.
