Terogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus by a population analysis profile (PAP)area under the curve (AUC) method; it belonged to the Chinese predominant clone ST239-spa t030 MRSA [24]. The purified PCR products were spotted in duplicate on CSS-1000 silylated glass slides (CEL) using a SpotArray72 microarray printing system (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Massachusetts, USA) to construct the DNA microarrays.a gene in a given strain. The microarray data had been deposited in public database ArrayExpress (Accession NO.: A-MEXP-2250).Clustering and Phylogenetic AnalysisThe final absent (0) or present (1) was assigned to each gene for each strain in the CGH data,. Hierarchical clustering of gene expression across species was performed with Cluster 3.0 using the uncentered Pearson correlation as the distance metric [25]. The clustered microarray data were displayed by the TreeView tool.PCR ValidationThe selected representative genes by CGH analysis were confirmed via gene-specific PCR. The primers used, listed in Table S1, were the same ones used to generate PCR products spotted on our microarray. PCR products were amplified with the following conditions: 94uC for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94uC for 30 s, 60uC for 30 s, 72uC for 60 s, and a final elongation step of 72uC for 5 min. 4 mL of each reaction was run on a 1 agarose gel. A positive reaction was recorded if a single clear band with the correct size was present.Microarray Labeling, Hybridizations, and ScanningGenomic DNAs were extracted using conventional sodium dodecyl sulfate lysis and phenol-chloroform extraction method. A mixture of equal quantities of Mu50 and CN79 genomic DNAs was used as reference DNA. Purified PCR products were referred to as the tested DNA. Cy3- or Cy5-labeled PLV-2 chemical information probes were generated by priming the reference or test DNA with random hexamers and extension with Klenow polymerase. The labeled reference and test DNAs were combined to hybridize with the microarrays by dualfluorescence hybridization. The hybridized slides were scanned using a GenePix 4100A personal microarray scanner (Axon Instruments, Foster City, California, USA.). The scanning images were processed, and the data were further analyzed using GenePix Pro 5.0 software (Axon Instruments, Foster City, California, USA) combined with Microsoft Excel software.Statistical 80-49-9 chemical information AnalysisStatistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 14.0 for Windows (SPSS). For statistical analysis, x2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the results. A P value of ,0.05 was considered statistically significant.Supporting InformationTable S1 Primers of representative genes used for PCRMicroarray Data AnalysisSpots with signal intensity (median) in the channel of the reference DNA less than two folds of the local background intensity (median) were rejected from further analysis. Spots with bad data because of slide abnormalities were discarded as well. Data normalization was performed on the remaining spots using total intensity normalization methods. A ratio of intensity (Test DNA normalized intensity/Reference DNA normalized intensity) was recorded for each spot and then converted to log2. Genes with fewer than three data points were considered unreliable and were accordingly removed. The averaged log2 ratio for each remaining gene on the two replicate slides was ultimately calculated. If 20 of the strains had a gene with missing data, the gene was removed. A total of 2,457 ge.Terogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus by a population analysis profile (PAP)area under the curve (AUC) method; it belonged to the Chinese predominant clone ST239-spa t030 MRSA [24]. The purified PCR products were spotted in duplicate on CSS-1000 silylated glass slides (CEL) using a SpotArray72 microarray printing system (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Massachusetts, USA) to construct the DNA microarrays.a gene in a given strain. The microarray data had been deposited in public database ArrayExpress (Accession NO.: A-MEXP-2250).Clustering and Phylogenetic AnalysisThe final absent (0) or present (1) was assigned to each gene for each strain in the CGH data,. Hierarchical clustering of gene expression across species was performed with Cluster 3.0 using the uncentered Pearson correlation as the distance metric [25]. The clustered microarray data were displayed by the TreeView tool.PCR ValidationThe selected representative genes by CGH analysis were confirmed via gene-specific PCR. The primers used, listed in Table S1, were the same ones used to generate PCR products spotted on our microarray. PCR products were amplified with the following conditions: 94uC for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94uC for 30 s, 60uC for 30 s, 72uC for 60 s, and a final elongation step of 72uC for 5 min. 4 mL of each reaction was run on a 1 agarose gel. A positive reaction was recorded if a single clear band with the correct size was present.Microarray Labeling, Hybridizations, and ScanningGenomic DNAs were extracted using conventional sodium dodecyl sulfate lysis and phenol-chloroform extraction method. A mixture of equal quantities of Mu50 and CN79 genomic DNAs was used as reference DNA. Purified PCR products were referred to as the tested DNA. Cy3- or Cy5-labeled probes were generated by priming the reference or test DNA with random hexamers and extension with Klenow polymerase. The labeled reference and test DNAs were combined to hybridize with the microarrays by dualfluorescence hybridization. The hybridized slides were scanned using a GenePix 4100A personal microarray scanner (Axon Instruments, Foster City, California, USA.). The scanning images were processed, and the data were further analyzed using GenePix Pro 5.0 software (Axon Instruments, Foster City, California, USA) combined with Microsoft Excel software.Statistical AnalysisStatistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 14.0 for Windows (SPSS). For statistical analysis, x2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the results. A P value of ,0.05 was considered statistically significant.Supporting InformationTable S1 Primers of representative genes used for PCRMicroarray Data AnalysisSpots with signal intensity (median) in the channel of the reference DNA less than two folds of the local background intensity (median) were rejected from further analysis. Spots with bad data because of slide abnormalities were discarded as well. Data normalization was performed on the remaining spots using total intensity normalization methods. A ratio of intensity (Test DNA normalized intensity/Reference DNA normalized intensity) was recorded for each spot and then converted to log2. Genes with fewer than three data points were considered unreliable and were accordingly removed. The averaged log2 ratio for each remaining gene on the two replicate slides was ultimately calculated. If 20 of the strains had a gene with missing data, the gene was removed. A total of 2,457 ge.
