Roles in ECM remodeling processes, including the promotion of 3D gels invasion by human MedChemExpress eFT508 mesenchymal stem cellsEpicardial-Derived Interstitial CellsFigure 6. Evaluation of EPIC clones (cEP) proteolytic activity and sprouting. A. Representative images are shown for the culture of EPIC clones (cEP1?) in 3D fibrin gels. B. The phenotype of the clones is illustrated in the left table. Note that some cell spheroids (asterisks) preferentially degrade the fibrin (`proteolytic’ clones), generating characteristic halo around the cells (arrowheads). Others (`sprouting’ clones) attach to the fibrin and spread over it forming multicellular sprouts (arrowheads). The fibrin gel digested area was graphically represented for each clone (middle) and plotted against the respective sprouting area of each clone (mm2, right). C. qPCR analyses of MMP, ADAM and TIMP expression in three significant cEP (cEP4 for maximal proteolysis and cEP6,7 for maximal sprouting). (p,0.05). Scale bars: 100 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053694.g[52] and various CD44+ cell lines [53]. It is thus reasonable to suggest that the whole proteolytic program active during pathologic ventricular 25331948 remodeling could depend on the interaction of CF subpopulations of various origins with very different proteolytic potentials. Since the heterogeneous morphology and molecular phenotype of EPICs suggests that different EPIC subpopulations could have different migratory properties, we decided to analyze the proteolytic profile of various EPIC clones. Functional fibrin matrix degradation assays indicate that some clones present a fast fibrin degradation rate (cEP4, 5, 8), whereas other clones degrade the matrix in a slow manner but have a buy INK1197 patent sprouting activity (cEP6, 7). We have found that EPIC fibrin degradation and sprouting over the matrix are negatively correlated. We interpret that EPIC clones with a high proteolytic activity degrade the matrix so fast that they fail to progress in cell-to-matrix adhesion and subsequent migration (represented by the `sprouting’ phenotype). This hypothesis would support the concept of CF activation and involvement in ventricular remodeling as a result of the interaction of different CF subpopulations. The analysis of ourresults indicates that the EPIC clone showing the highest sprouting activity (cEP7) mainly expresses high levels of MMP-14, ADAM17 and TIMP-1 and 3, whereas the clone with extreme proteolytic properties (cEP4) mostly activates ADAM-10, sustaining a most balanced expression of other molecules like ADAM-15 or 19 or TIMPs. Hence, the role of the whole cardiac interstitium as an interactive community of cells (some of them sustaining de novo myocardial differentiation or myocardial survival, others developing a stromal, feeder-like role) could be instrumental to define their functions in reparative responses of the damaged heart [54]. Still, more research is required to identify the subpopulations of CICs (of epicardial and non-epicardial origin) that drive massive fibrotic responses in the diseased heart. In conclusion, this study indicates that EPICs retain the ability to differentiate into various cardiovascular cell kinds, especially those related to cardiac interstitium development (myofibroblasts and CFs). Furthermore, EPIC display a complex proteolytic program built from the interaction of the characteristic proteolytic properties of EPIC subpopulations. Finally, EPICs could be used as a good model to study ventricular remodeling by co.Roles in ECM remodeling processes, including the promotion of 3D gels invasion by human mesenchymal stem cellsEpicardial-Derived Interstitial CellsFigure 6. Evaluation of EPIC clones (cEP) proteolytic activity and sprouting. A. Representative images are shown for the culture of EPIC clones (cEP1?) in 3D fibrin gels. B. The phenotype of the clones is illustrated in the left table. Note that some cell spheroids (asterisks) preferentially degrade the fibrin (`proteolytic’ clones), generating characteristic halo around the cells (arrowheads). Others (`sprouting’ clones) attach to the fibrin and spread over it forming multicellular sprouts (arrowheads). The fibrin gel digested area was graphically represented for each clone (middle) and plotted against the respective sprouting area of each clone (mm2, right). C. qPCR analyses of MMP, ADAM and TIMP expression in three significant cEP (cEP4 for maximal proteolysis and cEP6,7 for maximal sprouting). (p,0.05). Scale bars: 100 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053694.g[52] and various CD44+ cell lines [53]. It is thus reasonable to suggest that the whole proteolytic program active during pathologic ventricular 25331948 remodeling could depend on the interaction of CF subpopulations of various origins with very different proteolytic potentials. Since the heterogeneous morphology and molecular phenotype of EPICs suggests that different EPIC subpopulations could have different migratory properties, we decided to analyze the proteolytic profile of various EPIC clones. Functional fibrin matrix degradation assays indicate that some clones present a fast fibrin degradation rate (cEP4, 5, 8), whereas other clones degrade the matrix in a slow manner but have a patent sprouting activity (cEP6, 7). We have found that EPIC fibrin degradation and sprouting over the matrix are negatively correlated. We interpret that EPIC clones with a high proteolytic activity degrade the matrix so fast that they fail to progress in cell-to-matrix adhesion and subsequent migration (represented by the `sprouting’ phenotype). This hypothesis would support the concept of CF activation and involvement in ventricular remodeling as a result of the interaction of different CF subpopulations. The analysis of ourresults indicates that the EPIC clone showing the highest sprouting activity (cEP7) mainly expresses high levels of MMP-14, ADAM17 and TIMP-1 and 3, whereas the clone with extreme proteolytic properties (cEP4) mostly activates ADAM-10, sustaining a most balanced expression of other molecules like ADAM-15 or 19 or TIMPs. Hence, the role of the whole cardiac interstitium as an interactive community of cells (some of them sustaining de novo myocardial differentiation or myocardial survival, others developing a stromal, feeder-like role) could be instrumental to define their functions in reparative responses of the damaged heart [54]. Still, more research is required to identify the subpopulations of CICs (of epicardial and non-epicardial origin) that drive massive fibrotic responses in the diseased heart. In conclusion, this study indicates that EPICs retain the ability to differentiate into various cardiovascular cell kinds, especially those related to cardiac interstitium development (myofibroblasts and CFs). Furthermore, EPIC display a complex proteolytic program built from the interaction of the characteristic proteolytic properties of EPIC subpopulations. Finally, EPICs could be used as a good model to study ventricular remodeling by co.
