Ne AoAC absent group (n = 223) All-cause mortality AoAC progression Cardiovascular mortality AoAC progressionaAdjustedPHR (95 CI)P2.679 (1.255?.717)0.a2.625 (1.15?.991)0.3.506 (1.16?0.598)0.a4.008 (1.079?4.890)0.5.017 (1.853?3.587)0.b3.408 (1.028?1.300)0.7.026 (1.408?5.053)0.b5.935 (0.912?6.995)NSAdjusted: adjusted for age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, previous cardiovascular disease, log high sensitivity C-reative protein, and albumin levels. Adjusted: adjusted for age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, previous cardiovascular disease, lipid-lowering therapy, log high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and albumin levels. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048793.tbdue to limited GS-9973 information about detailed smoking status (ex- or current smoker), the relationship of the smoking status and the amount of smoking with AoAC could not be thoroughly clarified in this study. Compared to previous studies on the association of various parameters with vascular calcification and the clinical consequences of vascular calcification, the risk factors for the progression of vascular calcification are largely unexplored in dialysis patients. In addition, impacts of the vascular calcification progression on these patients’ outcome have not been elucidated. A previous study by Sigrist et al [14] investigated the independent factors associated with the progression of vascular calcification and the influence of it on mortality over 24 months in 134 patients with stage 4 and 5 CKD. It found that progressive calcification was associated with age, male gender, and serum alkaline phosphatase levels. Tenofovir alafenamide cost Similarly, the NECOSAD study showed that age, hypercalcemia, hyperparathyroidism, and the interval between the first and last assessed AoACS were significantly linked with an increase in calcification score over time [3]. Kim et al [26] also found that age, dialysis duration, and the presence of AoAC were related to AoAC progression. However, in those studies, about two-thirds of patients were HD patients. In addition, changes in calcification score were significantly higher in 1655472 HD patients than in PD patients. Moreover, the interval between the first and last measurement of AoACS was inconsistent in the NECOSAD study [3]. In this study, only incident PD patients were included and the interval between the first and follow-up AoACS assessment was 12 months in all patients. Therefore, the results of the aforementioned studies may not be applicable to ours. Even though age was significantly associated with AoAC progression in our subjects, when analysis was preformed separately according to the baseline AoAC presence, the association of age and AoACS with progression remained meaningful only in patients without baseline AoAC. Considering that age was significantly higher in patients with baseline AoAC than in patients without, we surmised that the effect of age on AoAC progression might be lessened in elderly incident PD patients who already had AoAC. In the present study, AoAC progression was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome in incident PD patients, which isin agreement with the results of most previous studies [3,11,18]. However, the mechanism by which AoAC progression influences mortality in ESRD patients has not been fully understood. We suppose that a different type of vascular calcification can be one of the possible mechanisms. London et al [9] examined the impact of intimal and medial.Ne AoAC absent group (n = 223) All-cause mortality AoAC progression Cardiovascular mortality AoAC progressionaAdjustedPHR (95 CI)P2.679 (1.255?.717)0.a2.625 (1.15?.991)0.3.506 (1.16?0.598)0.a4.008 (1.079?4.890)0.5.017 (1.853?3.587)0.b3.408 (1.028?1.300)0.7.026 (1.408?5.053)0.b5.935 (0.912?6.995)NSAdjusted: adjusted for age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, previous cardiovascular disease, log high sensitivity C-reative protein, and albumin levels. Adjusted: adjusted for age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, previous cardiovascular disease, lipid-lowering therapy, log high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and albumin levels. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048793.tbdue to limited information about detailed smoking status (ex- or current smoker), the relationship of the smoking status and the amount of smoking with AoAC could not be thoroughly clarified in this study. Compared to previous studies on the association of various parameters with vascular calcification and the clinical consequences of vascular calcification, the risk factors for the progression of vascular calcification are largely unexplored in dialysis patients. In addition, impacts of the vascular calcification progression on these patients’ outcome have not been elucidated. A previous study by Sigrist et al [14] investigated the independent factors associated with the progression of vascular calcification and the influence of it on mortality over 24 months in 134 patients with stage 4 and 5 CKD. It found that progressive calcification was associated with age, male gender, and serum alkaline phosphatase levels. Similarly, the NECOSAD study showed that age, hypercalcemia, hyperparathyroidism, and the interval between the first and last assessed AoACS were significantly linked with an increase in calcification score over time [3]. Kim et al [26] also found that age, dialysis duration, and the presence of AoAC were related to AoAC progression. However, in those studies, about two-thirds of patients were HD patients. In addition, changes in calcification score were significantly higher in 1655472 HD patients than in PD patients. Moreover, the interval between the first and last measurement of AoACS was inconsistent in the NECOSAD study [3]. In this study, only incident PD patients were included and the interval between the first and follow-up AoACS assessment was 12 months in all patients. Therefore, the results of the aforementioned studies may not be applicable to ours. Even though age was significantly associated with AoAC progression in our subjects, when analysis was preformed separately according to the baseline AoAC presence, the association of age and AoACS with progression remained meaningful only in patients without baseline AoAC. Considering that age was significantly higher in patients with baseline AoAC than in patients without, we surmised that the effect of age on AoAC progression might be lessened in elderly incident PD patients who already had AoAC. In the present study, AoAC progression was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome in incident PD patients, which isin agreement with the results of most previous studies [3,11,18]. However, the mechanism by which AoAC progression influences mortality in ESRD patients has not been fully understood. We suppose that a different type of vascular calcification can be one of the possible mechanisms. London et al [9] examined the impact of intimal and medial.
