Ng the same period as a mandatory business trip. The decision to prioritize one responsibility over the other will be informed by affect (e.g., fear of limited career advancement, disappointment for missing the game), cognitive processes (e.g., predictions of how far his son’s team will make it in the tournament, the relative importance of this one business trip to his career trajectory), social cognitive processes (e.g., how disappointed this son would be if his father missed the game) and impression management (e.g., not wanting to look selfish). Underlying each of these processes is a host of attitudes and beliefs (e.g., how does a “good dad”/”good employee” behave) and corresponding neural circuitry. Underlying each of the (minimally) four decision-making Metformin (hydrochloride) web forces for resolving the work amily conflict are myriad linkages across the various neurological and psychological levels.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptFam Relat. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 February 01.Grzywacz and SmithPageThe second principle of the doctrine of multilevel analysis is that of non-additive determinism. This principle states that properties of the collective whole cannot be buy OPC-8212 accurately predicted from the properties of its parts until the properties of the whole are documented and studied across multiple levels (Cacioppo Berntson, 1992). Schieman and Glavin (2011) clearly illustrated this principle in their analysis of data from the 2002 National Study of the Changing Workforce, which examined educational variation in the sources and mental health consequences of work amily conflict. Schieman and Glavin identified differential exposure to elevated work amily conflict by individuals with both the lowest and highest levels of educational attainment. Work amily conflict was driven by the stresses of supervision and responsibility for higher education workers, but it was driven by precarious work and poor predictability of scheduling among workers with less than a high school education. Furthermore, the association of work amily conflict with psychological distress differed by education, such that the psychological consequence of work amily conflict was higher for those with a high school degree relative to college graduates. Clearly, understanding how paid work may affect the health of working parents requires a thorough understanding of each part of the constituent model and different levels in the social hierarchy. The third principle, reciprocal determinism, states there likely are bidirectional and mutual influences between the biological and social elements underlying brain and behavior. This principle is consistent with the “punctuated equilibrium” view of working parents’ experience of work amily conflict (Majomi, Brown, Crawford, 2003); that is, working parents can minimize experiences of work amily conflict by developing adaptive strategies (Moen Wethington, 1992) for managing daily work and family responsibilities. Work?family conflict (and subsequence experience of work amily interference) arises when threats or contingencies not specific to the parent’s family-adaptive strategies become manifest, and they will continue until the adaptive strategy is refined to accommodate the new threat. The only empirical illustration of the principle of reciprocal determinism that we could locate was provided by Demerouti, Bakker, and Bulters (2004), who used three panels of data to identify the mutual and bidirec.Ng the same period as a mandatory business trip. The decision to prioritize one responsibility over the other will be informed by affect (e.g., fear of limited career advancement, disappointment for missing the game), cognitive processes (e.g., predictions of how far his son’s team will make it in the tournament, the relative importance of this one business trip to his career trajectory), social cognitive processes (e.g., how disappointed this son would be if his father missed the game) and impression management (e.g., not wanting to look selfish). Underlying each of these processes is a host of attitudes and beliefs (e.g., how does a “good dad”/”good employee” behave) and corresponding neural circuitry. Underlying each of the (minimally) four decision-making forces for resolving the work amily conflict are myriad linkages across the various neurological and psychological levels.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptFam Relat. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 February 01.Grzywacz and SmithPageThe second principle of the doctrine of multilevel analysis is that of non-additive determinism. This principle states that properties of the collective whole cannot be accurately predicted from the properties of its parts until the properties of the whole are documented and studied across multiple levels (Cacioppo Berntson, 1992). Schieman and Glavin (2011) clearly illustrated this principle in their analysis of data from the 2002 National Study of the Changing Workforce, which examined educational variation in the sources and mental health consequences of work amily conflict. Schieman and Glavin identified differential exposure to elevated work amily conflict by individuals with both the lowest and highest levels of educational attainment. Work amily conflict was driven by the stresses of supervision and responsibility for higher education workers, but it was driven by precarious work and poor predictability of scheduling among workers with less than a high school education. Furthermore, the association of work amily conflict with psychological distress differed by education, such that the psychological consequence of work amily conflict was higher for those with a high school degree relative to college graduates. Clearly, understanding how paid work may affect the health of working parents requires a thorough understanding of each part of the constituent model and different levels in the social hierarchy. The third principle, reciprocal determinism, states there likely are bidirectional and mutual influences between the biological and social elements underlying brain and behavior. This principle is consistent with the “punctuated equilibrium” view of working parents’ experience of work amily conflict (Majomi, Brown, Crawford, 2003); that is, working parents can minimize experiences of work amily conflict by developing adaptive strategies (Moen Wethington, 1992) for managing daily work and family responsibilities. Work?family conflict (and subsequence experience of work amily interference) arises when threats or contingencies not specific to the parent’s family-adaptive strategies become manifest, and they will continue until the adaptive strategy is refined to accommodate the new threat. The only empirical illustration of the principle of reciprocal determinism that we could locate was provided by Demerouti, Bakker, and Bulters (2004), who used three panels of data to identify the mutual and bidirec.
