Ges addressing tough issues such as sexual behavior and condom negotiation. Providers in other studies have had challenges with topics about behaviors that are stigmatized, for example, sexual activity among PLHIV and injecting drug use (Dawson Rose, Shade, Lum, Knight, Purcell Parsons 2005). Furthermore, because PP in healthcare facilities was being implemented gradually during this time period, it is difficult to ascertain if external factors such as the lack of condoms would have impacted the feasibility of implementing PP measures. Despite these limitations, PP interventions are an important component of HIV prevention efforts in PD168393 solubility Mozambique and are part of the national strategy (CNCS 2009). Our results demonstrate that a PP intervention approach in Mozambique is acceptable, but there are social and cultural challenges that must be addressed. Although healthcare providers face many challenges to implementing PP, they expressed the importance of reducing the onward transmission of HIV through these PP interventions. By scalingup PP interventions, it will be possible to reach more PLHIV and this may help to slow the incidence of HIV in Mozambique.Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDSVOL. 12 NO. 1Article OriginalAcknowledgementsThis research has been supported by the PEPFAR through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under the terms of cooperative agreement H-F3-MOZ-07-PTR-PWPS and PS002770-01. We wish to thank Margo Younger for editing the initial draft of this manuscript. We also wish to thank all the study participants who gave freely of their time and shared personal information with us. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The early decades of the nineteenth century were a turbulent time for English medicine. The return of demobilized military surgeons from the Napoleonic wars and the increasing numbers graduating from the Scottish universities and private anatomy schools served to swell the lowest ranks of the medical professional hierarchy. These general practitioners, as they were known, combined the practice of medicine and surgery while some also adopted the shop-based trade of the apothecary. Though predominantly catering to the nascent middle classes, their increasing numbers meant greater competition for trade, leading to widespread economic and social insecurity. It also fuelled internecine medical conflict as those at the bottom sought to challenge the hegemonic position occupied by the corporate elites of the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Surgeons and reform the system in accordance with their own, avowedly democratic, interests.1 Of course, this situation both mirrored and was shaped by events in the wider social, economic and political landscape. The post-war years were characterized by agricultural distress, labour unrest and radical political agitation, including such openly insurrectionary incidents as the Spa Fields Riots of 1816 and the Pentrich Rising of 1817. Indeed, as frustrated artisans, the general practitioners of the medical sphere had much in common with the radicalized followers of `King Ludd’ or Thomas Spence. A number of historians have been sensitive to these HM61713, BI 1482694 web parallels between the medical and the political. In his peerless study of early nineteenth-century medical radicalism, for example, Adrian Desmond has drawn out the de.Ges addressing tough issues such as sexual behavior and condom negotiation. Providers in other studies have had challenges with topics about behaviors that are stigmatized, for example, sexual activity among PLHIV and injecting drug use (Dawson Rose, Shade, Lum, Knight, Purcell Parsons 2005). Furthermore, because PP in healthcare facilities was being implemented gradually during this time period, it is difficult to ascertain if external factors such as the lack of condoms would have impacted the feasibility of implementing PP measures. Despite these limitations, PP interventions are an important component of HIV prevention efforts in Mozambique and are part of the national strategy (CNCS 2009). Our results demonstrate that a PP intervention approach in Mozambique is acceptable, but there are social and cultural challenges that must be addressed. Although healthcare providers face many challenges to implementing PP, they expressed the importance of reducing the onward transmission of HIV through these PP interventions. By scalingup PP interventions, it will be possible to reach more PLHIV and this may help to slow the incidence of HIV in Mozambique.Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDSVOL. 12 NO. 1Article OriginalAcknowledgementsThis research has been supported by the PEPFAR through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under the terms of cooperative agreement H-F3-MOZ-07-PTR-PWPS and PS002770-01. We wish to thank Margo Younger for editing the initial draft of this manuscript. We also wish to thank all the study participants who gave freely of their time and shared personal information with us. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The early decades of the nineteenth century were a turbulent time for English medicine. The return of demobilized military surgeons from the Napoleonic wars and the increasing numbers graduating from the Scottish universities and private anatomy schools served to swell the lowest ranks of the medical professional hierarchy. These general practitioners, as they were known, combined the practice of medicine and surgery while some also adopted the shop-based trade of the apothecary. Though predominantly catering to the nascent middle classes, their increasing numbers meant greater competition for trade, leading to widespread economic and social insecurity. It also fuelled internecine medical conflict as those at the bottom sought to challenge the hegemonic position occupied by the corporate elites of the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Surgeons and reform the system in accordance with their own, avowedly democratic, interests.1 Of course, this situation both mirrored and was shaped by events in the wider social, economic and political landscape. The post-war years were characterized by agricultural distress, labour unrest and radical political agitation, including such openly insurrectionary incidents as the Spa Fields Riots of 1816 and the Pentrich Rising of 1817. Indeed, as frustrated artisans, the general practitioners of the medical sphere had much in common with the radicalized followers of `King Ludd’ or Thomas Spence. A number of historians have been sensitive to these parallels between the medical and the political. In his peerless study of early nineteenth-century medical radicalism, for example, Adrian Desmond has drawn out the de.
