R cities in China with related socioeconomic situations.PLOS One DOI
R cities in China with comparable socioeconomic conditions.PLOS A single DOI:0.37journal.pone.03472 August 4,9 MSM among Rural Migrants in China: GISGPS Random Sample SurveyTable two. Migration Experience and Comparison of Living Condition, Neighborhood Atmosphere and HIVrelated Danger Behaviors amongst Rural Migrants and Nonmigrant Urban and Rural Residents, Imply or [95 CI]. Variables Migration experiences No. of cities migrated, city two cities !four cities Years migrated to Wuhan Median [IQR] No. of residence visits in the past year, 0 time instances !3 times Sending income property Yes Intention to move, Most likely Unsure Unlikely Living circumstances Residential areas, Old town New town Ruralurban joint zone Suburban Housing ownership, Owner Rental Other people Living arrangement, Living alone With others Neighborhood atmosphere Perceived safety, Secure Unsure Unsafe Perceived urban residents about, Much less than half A half Far more than a half Presence of prior acquaintances, Yes Existence of entertainment venues, None Some Quite a bit Accessibility of entertainment venues, (Continued) 2.5 [9.two,5.7] 60.5 [55.four,65.5] 27. [22.3,3.8] two.2 [9.three,5.] 58.9 [54.5,63.2] 28.9 [2532.8] 69.2[64.four,74.0] 26.7[22.3,three.] four. [.five, six.6] 73.0 [68.2,77.9] 74.two [70.3,78.2] NA 30.6 [26.eight,34.5] 6.4 [.four,2.4] 53.0 [47.six,58.4] 3. [0.0,six.2] 5.9 [2.4,9.3] 7.0 [67.0,75.] NA NA NA 68.9 [6473.7] 24.4 [9.eight,29.0] 6.7 [4.7, 8.6] 63.5 [59.5,67.6] 30.0 [26.two,33.9] six.four [4.two, 8.7] 55.4[49.5,six.2] 33.6[28.three,38.9] .0[7.6,four.4] 50.0 [44.9,55.2] 50.0 [44.eight,55.] 40.five [36.two,44.8] 59.five [55.two,63.8] 33.7[28.2,39.] 66.3[60.9,7.8] 7.two [420.3] 67.6 [62.9,72.3] 5.two [9.3] 70. [66.three,73.8] .6 [9.0,four.3] eight.3 [5.2,two.5] NA NA NA four.4 [36.2,46.7] 39.0 [34.3,43.8] 9.7 [7.0,2.5] 9.8 [72.5] 55.eight [5.6,60.0] eight.3 [5.0,two.6] 2.0 [7.six,24.5] four.9 [3.7,six.] NA NA NA NA 3.9 [27.7,36.2] three.5 [0.6,6.5] 54.5 [49.8,59.3] 9.2 [6.86] 0.[7.three,2.8] 80.8[77.3,84.3] 4.2[0.4,7.9] two.9[9.0,six.9] 72.9[67.8,78.0] 86.9 [82.2,9.6] NA NA 8. [5.5,0.8] 34.0 [2839.9] 57.9 [5263.7] NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.0 [3.five, five.7] NA NA 25.9 [20.9,30.8] 43.6 [38.0,49.2] 30.5 [2536.0] NA NA NA NA NA NA Rural migrants Urban residents Rural residentsPLOS One BI-78D3 web particular DOI:0.37journal.pone.03472 August four,0 MSM amongst Rural Migrants in China: GISGPS Random Sample SurveyTable 2. (Continued) Variables Practical Unsure Inconvenient HIVrelated threat behaviors Engage in commercial sex Yes Consistent condom use Yes Frequent drinkers Yes Frequent alcohol intoxicated Yes Binge drinkers Yes Trouble drinkers Yes Each day smokers Yes 32.6 [28 37.2] 42.two [37.9, 46.5] 42. [36 48.0] 54. [49.2, 59.] 46.three [4.9, 50.7] 49. [43.3, 54.9] 9. [6.0, 22.2] 28.four [25.0, 3.9] 24.7 [2.2, 28.] 45. [4.3, 48.9] 48.eight [45.0, 52.5] 55.9 [5.9, 59.8] 24.7 [2.3, 28.0] 25.4 [22.0, 28.9] 36.9 [33 40.7] 24. [20 28.] 23.7 [8.9, 28.5] three.4 [6.9, 9.9] 5.6 [4.7, 6.5] four.9 [3 six.7] 3.0 [.2, four.7] Rural migrants 58.5 [53.7,63.3] 27. [23.two,30.9] 4.four [.4,7.4] Urban residents 60. [56.0,64.2] 24.6 [2.2,28.0] 5.three [2.2,8.4] Rural residents 24.7[9.eight,29.7] 23.2[8.2,28.3] 52.[46.two,57.9]Note: Estimated with information collected from random samples. An exclusive 95 CI of a measure indicates a considerable distinction at p .05 level between the rural PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24180537 migrant sample and the nonmigrant urban and rural resident samples. NA: Not applicable since the information have been not collected for nonmigrants. doi:0.37journal.pone.03472.tSignificantly much more MSM amongst rural migrants with high prevalence of HIV threat behaviorResults of this study show that it really is not the HIV danger behavi.
