rsistent and virulent infections. Our results clearly demonstrate that the both the MTB-PPX1 and Rv1026 proteins lack the ability to hydrolyze AZD-2171 chemical information pppGpp to ppGpp. It remains to be seen whether M. tuberculosis encodes an alternative protein with GPP functionality, or does not require this alarmone-converting activity. The bifunctional RelMTB protein is the only source of pppGpp and ppGpp molecules in M. tuberculosis. Polyphosphate molecules modulate the transcription of relMTB via a two-component MprAB/SigE pathway, thereby regulating ppGpp production. Via this mechanism, increased polyphosphate levels lead to increased ppGpp levels. In E. coli, there is Biochemical Activities of Rv0496 and Rv1026 positive feedback via the ppGpp-mediated inhibition of PPX activities; thereby prolonging the intracellular lifetime of polyphosphate. As pppGpp, and to a lesser extent ppGpp, inhibit the exopolyphosphatase activities of MTB-PPX1, our results suggest that this regulatory feedback 
is also present in M. tuberculosis. To briefly conclude, our results demonstrate that the Rv0496 protein functions as a short-chain exopolyphosphatase, whose activities are inhibited by ppGpp alarmones produced during the bacterial stringent response. Neither MTBPPX1 nor Rv1026 have the ability to hydrolyze pppGpp, a property that makes them notably different to the GPP and PPX proteins from E. coli. The data presented here reveals that members of the PPX-GppA protein family possess notable differences in their catalytic activities, indicating that overall sequence homology may not be a reliable indicator of biochemical or biological functionality. pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 60 mM imidazole. EF-RelQ protein was eluted with 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 100 mM imidazole. Rv0496 and Rv1026 proteins were eluted with maltosebinding buffer containing 10 mM maltose. The N-terminal maltose binding protein fusion was cleaved using Factor Xa according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cleaved protein mixtures were dialyzed against fresh maltose-binding buffer, then maltose affinity chromatography was used to remove the cleaved MBP tags. Protein concentrations were determined using the BioRad Protein assay, and protein purity was determined by densitometry after 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22203538 Gel filtration chromatography The molecular masses of the recombinant Rv0496, Rv1026, E. coli GPP, E. coli PPX and E. faecalis RelQ proteins were determined by size exclusion chromatography on a Superdex 200 gel filtration column using an AKTA purifier system. Calibration curves were constructed using protein standards. Materials and Methods Gene cloning procedures Rv0496 and Rv1026. The rv0496 and rv1026 genes were PCR amplified from M. tuberculosis H37Rv genomic DNA using the Rv0496for2 and Rv0496rev2, and Rv1026for and Rv1026rev primer pairs, respectively, with the use of LongAmp Taq DNA polymerase from New England Biolabs. After TOPO cloning, amplified genes were subcloned, into similarly digested pMAL-c2 expression vectors, to encode Nterminal maltose binding protein fusions. The MBP protein was expressed from unmodified plasmid pMAL-c2, for use as a negative control. For a list of the primers used in this study, see Light scattering Known dilutions of the purified protein samples were pipetted onto 384-well Greiner Glass Bottom SensoPlates. Samples were irradiated using a semiconductor laser, on a DynaPro Plate Reader Plus. Collected data were analyzed using
