Tcomes of working parents. A central issue underlying all three of these gaps likely are selection biases shaping entrance into, and type of, paid employment that may affect decision making and subsequent processes linking work amily conflict with health (Repetti Wang, 2014).Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptSocial Neuroscience: Introduction and PotentialWe maintain that social neuroscience has substantial potential for addressing several of the unresolved issues and gaps in the paid work, parenting, and health literature. Consequently, we begin this section with a basic overview of social neuroscience, including its basic focus and key propositions. Given the breadth of social neuroscience, this material is intended toFam Relat. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 February 01.Grzywacz and SmithPagebe introductory rather than definitive. Next, we summarize selected areas of research in social neuroscience, emphasizing areas that have the potential to offer insight into one or more of the unresolved issues or gaps in research focused on paid work, parenting, and health. We then use these reviews to articulate recommendations for future research, and then we describe the practical value of pursuing the advocated lines of research. Introduction to Social Neuroscience Social neuroscience was birthed at the launch of the congressionally labeled “decade of the brain” (Cacioppo Berntson, 1992). Cacioppo and Berntson (1992) cogently argued for the importance of studying phenomena across difference scales or perspectives, ranging from the microscopic (i.e., neurophysiological) to the macroscopic (i.e., social psychological), emphasizing the integration of findings from both perspectives. They pointed out the reality that neurological processes underlie everyday thoughts and behaviors and that social forces shape the expression and power of those neurological processes. As such, social neuroscience is an emerging interdisciplinary field focused on the relations of the neural, hormonal, Pan-RAS-IN-1 biological activity cellular, and genetic processes needed to implement and maintain social behavior and how the social environment acts upon these biological processes (Cacioppo Cacioppo, 2013). Cacioppo and Berntson (1992) argued that the doctrine of multilevel analysis, including its three principles and one corollary, is at the core social neuroscience. The first principle, multiple determinism, is the premise that a phenomenon on one level is likely to have multiple causes on the same level, as well as adjacent and subsequent levels. This principle is clearly evidenced in our brief review of the antecedents of work amily conflict. An individual’s experience of work interference with family, for example, may be “caused” by individual-level factors such as work role overload and the number of hours worked, as well social-level factors (e.g., availability of family-friendly policies, supervisor support) and psychological factors like personality and the salience of the work role (Butts et al., 2013; Michel et al., 2011). The corollary of proximity states that, as the number of levels in the organization of phenomenon increases, there is a proportionate increase in the number of PD150606 price linkages between elements at each level. The corollary of proximity can be illustrated through a decision tree following a hypothetical experience of work amily conflict resulting from a working father’s realization that his son’s state soccer tournament is duri.Tcomes of working parents. A central issue underlying all three of these gaps likely are selection biases shaping entrance into, and type of, paid employment that may affect decision making and subsequent processes linking work amily conflict with health (Repetti Wang, 2014).Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptSocial Neuroscience: Introduction and PotentialWe maintain that social neuroscience has substantial potential for addressing several of the unresolved issues and gaps in the paid work, parenting, and health literature. Consequently, we begin this section with a basic overview of social neuroscience, including its basic focus and key propositions. Given the breadth of social neuroscience, this material is intended toFam Relat. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 February 01.Grzywacz and SmithPagebe introductory rather than definitive. Next, we summarize selected areas of research in social neuroscience, emphasizing areas that have the potential to offer insight into one or more of the unresolved issues or gaps in research focused on paid work, parenting, and health. We then use these reviews to articulate recommendations for future research, and then we describe the practical value of pursuing the advocated lines of research. Introduction to Social Neuroscience Social neuroscience was birthed at the launch of the congressionally labeled “decade of the brain” (Cacioppo Berntson, 1992). Cacioppo and Berntson (1992) cogently argued for the importance of studying phenomena across difference scales or perspectives, ranging from the microscopic (i.e., neurophysiological) to the macroscopic (i.e., social psychological), emphasizing the integration of findings from both perspectives. They pointed out the reality that neurological processes underlie everyday thoughts and behaviors and that social forces shape the expression and power of those neurological processes. As such, social neuroscience is an emerging interdisciplinary field focused on the relations of the neural, hormonal, cellular, and genetic processes needed to implement and maintain social behavior and how the social environment acts upon these biological processes (Cacioppo Cacioppo, 2013). Cacioppo and Berntson (1992) argued that the doctrine of multilevel analysis, including its three principles and one corollary, is at the core social neuroscience. The first principle, multiple determinism, is the premise that a phenomenon on one level is likely to have multiple causes on the same level, as well as adjacent and subsequent levels. This principle is clearly evidenced in our brief review of the antecedents of work amily conflict. An individual’s experience of work interference with family, for example, may be “caused” by individual-level factors such as work role overload and the number of hours worked, as well social-level factors (e.g., availability of family-friendly policies, supervisor support) and psychological factors like personality and the salience of the work role (Butts et al., 2013; Michel et al., 2011). The corollary of proximity states that, as the number of levels in the organization of phenomenon increases, there is a proportionate increase in the number of linkages between elements at each level. The corollary of proximity can be illustrated through a decision tree following a hypothetical experience of work amily conflict resulting from a working father’s realization that his son’s state soccer tournament is duri.
