Have questioned whether PP interventions are acceptable and feasible to implement and our work in Mozambique is among the first to look at whether PP interventions are acceptable and feasible from the standpoint of the healthcare provider. Another study looking at an HIV prevention intervention package for healthcare and treatment settings is underway in Kenya, Namibia, and Tanzania (Bachanas et al. 2012; Bachanas et al. 2013) while studies from South Africa have found that facility-based risk reduction interventions delivered by counselors for PLHIV are feasible to implement and acceptable to HIV-positive patients (Cornman et al. 2008; Cornman et al. 2011). Despite finding that PP interventions were acceptable and feasible to providers, many providers noted social and cultural challenges to implementing PP and improved intervention uptake among patients. These challenges included patient resistance to disclosingVOL. 12 NO. 1Journal des Aspects Sociaux du VIH/get HM61713, BI 1482694 SIDAOriginal ArticleHIV serostatus, difficulty negotiating for condoms, and difficulty engaging men. While providers recognized the benefits of disclosure, they also noted that disclosure to partners and family members was difficult for patients to implement due to fear of LM22A-4 web stigma and discrimination. Similar challenges to disclosure have also been noted in various African contexts (Greeff, Phetlhu, Makoae, Dlamini, Holzemer, Naidoo, et al. 2008; Medley, Garcia-Moreno, McGill Maman 2004). Addressing stigma and decreasing inequalities between PLHIV and un-infected individuals is consistent with the Global Network of PLHIV discourse that prioritizes patient experience and concerns about stigma as a center piece in their response to addressing transmission risk behavior among PLHIV (GNP+ n.d.; GNP+ UNAIDS 2011). It is also not surprising that fear of stigmatization affects the feasibility of prevention interventions focusing on PLHIV (Okoror, BeLue, Zungu, Adam Airhihenbuwa 2014). It may be that the traditional disclosure support being offered is insufficient, and that psychosocial support programs in Mozambique may need to rethink the way they support couple dynamics. Couples counseling and partner testing are two alternatives that could minimize the potential negative impacts of disclosure in this environment (Medley, Baggaley, Bachanas, Cohen, Shaffer Lo 2013). Bunnell, Meriman, et al. (2006) stated that disclosure, especially to partners, may facilitate effective prevention of sexual transmission of HIV, PMTCT, and treatment adherence. In Uganda, counselor-assisted disclosure for couples in their home or at a facility is being piloted, and in Kenya, partner disclosure by women with HIV has been associated with a fourfold increase in reported condom use to nearly 70 (Bunnell, Mermin, et al. 2006; Farquhar, Kiarie, Richardson, Kabura, John, Nduati, et al. 2004). Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections has been implemented in some African countries with mixed results, but could be adapted, in contextually appropriate ways, for HIV (Gaitan-Duarte, Farquhar, Horvath, Torres, Amaral, Angel, et al. 2014; Gichangi, Fonck, SekandeKigondu, Ndinya-Achola, Bwayo, Kiragu, et al. 2000). Although providers understood the importance of condoms for PLHIV, they recognized that condom use was challenging. These barriers have also been cited in other African countries such as Uganda and South Africa (Allen, Mbonye, Seeley, Birungi, Wolff, Coutinho, et al. 2011; Cornman et al.Have questioned whether PP interventions are acceptable and feasible to implement and our work in Mozambique is among the first to look at whether PP interventions are acceptable and feasible from the standpoint of the healthcare provider. Another study looking at an HIV prevention intervention package for healthcare and treatment settings is underway in Kenya, Namibia, and Tanzania (Bachanas et al. 2012; Bachanas et al. 2013) while studies from South Africa have found that facility-based risk reduction interventions delivered by counselors for PLHIV are feasible to implement and acceptable to HIV-positive patients (Cornman et al. 2008; Cornman et al. 2011). Despite finding that PP interventions were acceptable and feasible to providers, many providers noted social and cultural challenges to implementing PP and improved intervention uptake among patients. These challenges included patient resistance to disclosingVOL. 12 NO. 1Journal des Aspects Sociaux du VIH/SIDAOriginal ArticleHIV serostatus, difficulty negotiating for condoms, and difficulty engaging men. While providers recognized the benefits of disclosure, they also noted that disclosure to partners and family members was difficult for patients to implement due to fear of stigma and discrimination. Similar challenges to disclosure have also been noted in various African contexts (Greeff, Phetlhu, Makoae, Dlamini, Holzemer, Naidoo, et al. 2008; Medley, Garcia-Moreno, McGill Maman 2004). Addressing stigma and decreasing inequalities between PLHIV and un-infected individuals is consistent with the Global Network of PLHIV discourse that prioritizes patient experience and concerns about stigma as a center piece in their response to addressing transmission risk behavior among PLHIV (GNP+ n.d.; GNP+ UNAIDS 2011). It is also not surprising that fear of stigmatization affects the feasibility of prevention interventions focusing on PLHIV (Okoror, BeLue, Zungu, Adam Airhihenbuwa 2014). It may be that the traditional disclosure support being offered is insufficient, and that psychosocial support programs in Mozambique may need to rethink the way they support couple dynamics. Couples counseling and partner testing are two alternatives that could minimize the potential negative impacts of disclosure in this environment (Medley, Baggaley, Bachanas, Cohen, Shaffer Lo 2013). Bunnell, Meriman, et al. (2006) stated that disclosure, especially to partners, may facilitate effective prevention of sexual transmission of HIV, PMTCT, and treatment adherence. In Uganda, counselor-assisted disclosure for couples in their home or at a facility is being piloted, and in Kenya, partner disclosure by women with HIV has been associated with a fourfold increase in reported condom use to nearly 70 (Bunnell, Mermin, et al. 2006; Farquhar, Kiarie, Richardson, Kabura, John, Nduati, et al. 2004). Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections has been implemented in some African countries with mixed results, but could be adapted, in contextually appropriate ways, for HIV (Gaitan-Duarte, Farquhar, Horvath, Torres, Amaral, Angel, et al. 2014; Gichangi, Fonck, SekandeKigondu, Ndinya-Achola, Bwayo, Kiragu, et al. 2000). Although providers understood the importance of condoms for PLHIV, they recognized that condom use was challenging. These barriers have also been cited in other African countries such as Uganda and South Africa (Allen, Mbonye, Seeley, Birungi, Wolff, Coutinho, et al. 2011; Cornman et al.
