G balanced high quality RRT modality information as well as education [11?2]. In order to diminish the gap between reality and the desirable care needed, several pitfalls should be addressed: inadequate medical training, timely referral to nephrologists, PD98059MedChemExpress PD98059 inappropriate patient information and education for RRT modality choice, lack of specialized predialysis programs and lack of planned RRT initiation [13]. In addition, PD remains underused despite having demonstrated to be at least equal to HD as the first dialysis modality, especially while there is residual renal function [13?7]. Specialized predialysis programs have consistently demonstrated important benefits such as delayed progression of renal insufficiency, improved patient outcomes, decreased hospitalizations and urgent dialysis initiation need, as well as increased patient participation in modality choice and thereby increased use of home therapies [18?5]. However, such infrastructures are not widely established and frequently insufficiently staffed [13,19,23,26?9]. In the present study, we assess in a group of Eastern Europe ICS clinics which factors determine type of referral, modality provision and dialysis start on final RRT of a private renal services provider (Diaverum).Materials and MethodsThis is an international-multicenter observational retrospective study on the impact of ICS in all consecutive patients who started maintenance dialysis for CKD-5 from 1st January throughPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0155987 May 26,2 /Referral, Modality and Dialysis Start in an International Setting31st December 2012 in twenty-five ICS clinics in Poland, Hungary and Romania. Patients with pre-emptive get AZD-8055 transplants were excluded from the study. Information was collected on demographic variables, cause of renal disease, follow up since diagnosis of kidney disease, medical specialist providing care, type of referral to ICS clinic [defined as early (ER) if 3 months and late (LR) if <3 months], predialysis care devoted by general nephrologist or by specialized predialysis staff (where at least a nephrologist and a nurse have been appointed part time into specific predialysis care), number of medical visits in the year prior to the start of dialysis, type of dialysis at first session and as ascribed chronic RRT, analytical parameters at dialysis start [24 h. urine creatinine clearance, estimated GFR (MDRD-4), serum creatinine, albumin, calcium and phosphorus, hemoglobin levels] and EPO prescription. Information to patients on RRT modality (if provided) and general renal education (if delivered) were analyzed in a qualitative manner. Patients were assigned to the "modality informed" group when different RRT modalities were explained by staff, supportive information tools were used for this purpose (e.g. brochures, DVDs) or meetings with other patients in clinic facilities took place. Renal education was considered to be provided when patients were taught how to care for renal disorders and about the importance of compliance with prescriptions and follow-up visits. No single common protocol was created for this purpose. Each clinic designed the type and content of information taking into account local cultural issues. The patient choice of dialysis modality, informed consent signing (for information and at dialysis start) and time elapsed from provision of information to dialysis start were also recorded. RRT start was considered non-planned (NP) when either functional permanent access wa.G balanced high quality RRT modality information as well as education [11?2]. In order to diminish the gap between reality and the desirable care needed, several pitfalls should be addressed: inadequate medical training, timely referral to nephrologists, inappropriate patient information and education for RRT modality choice, lack of specialized predialysis programs and lack of planned RRT initiation [13]. In addition, PD remains underused despite having demonstrated to be at least equal to HD as the first dialysis modality, especially while there is residual renal function [13?7]. Specialized predialysis programs have consistently demonstrated important benefits such as delayed progression of renal insufficiency, improved patient outcomes, decreased hospitalizations and urgent dialysis initiation need, as well as increased patient participation in modality choice and thereby increased use of home therapies [18?5]. However, such infrastructures are not widely established and frequently insufficiently staffed [13,19,23,26?9]. In the present study, we assess in a group of Eastern Europe ICS clinics which factors determine type of referral, modality provision and dialysis start on final RRT of a private renal services provider (Diaverum).Materials and MethodsThis is an international-multicenter observational retrospective study on the impact of ICS in all consecutive patients who started maintenance dialysis for CKD-5 from 1st January throughPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0155987 May 26,2 /Referral, Modality and Dialysis Start in an International Setting31st December 2012 in twenty-five ICS clinics in Poland, Hungary and Romania. Patients with pre-emptive transplants were excluded from the study. Information was collected on demographic variables, cause of renal disease, follow up since diagnosis of kidney disease, medical specialist providing care, type of referral to ICS clinic [defined as early (ER) if 3 months and late (LR) if <3 months], predialysis care devoted by general nephrologist or by specialized predialysis staff (where at least a nephrologist and a nurse have been appointed part time into specific predialysis care), number of medical visits in the year prior to the start of dialysis, type of dialysis at first session and as ascribed chronic RRT, analytical parameters at dialysis start [24 h. urine creatinine clearance, estimated GFR (MDRD-4), serum creatinine, albumin, calcium and phosphorus, hemoglobin levels] and EPO prescription. Information to patients on RRT modality (if provided) and general renal education (if delivered) were analyzed in a qualitative manner. Patients were assigned to the "modality informed" group when different RRT modalities were explained by staff, supportive information tools were used for this purpose (e.g. brochures, DVDs) or meetings with other patients in clinic facilities took place. Renal education was considered to be provided when patients were taught how to care for renal disorders and about the importance of compliance with prescriptions and follow-up visits. No single common protocol was created for this purpose. Each clinic designed the type and content of information taking into account local cultural issues. The patient choice of dialysis modality, informed consent signing (for information and at dialysis start) and time elapsed from provision of information to dialysis start were also recorded. RRT start was considered non-planned (NP) when either functional permanent access wa.
